Examining School Board Leaders' Use of Online Resources to Inform Decision-Making | Examen de l’usage des ressources en ligne par les dirigeants des conseils scolaires pour guider les prises de décisions

Robin Holding Kay, Loralea Carruthers

Abstract


In the past five years, there has been considerable interest in the decision-making process of school board officials in the field of education.  However, a paucity of research exists on how these leaders use online resources to make decisions.  Through an online survey and face to face interviews, this study examined the use of online resources by school-board trustees (n=164) to guide board-level decisions.  Trustees used online articles (news, research articles, journals) twice as much as social media (Twitter, Facebook, blogs) or repository services (clipping services, Google Scholar).  Almost 70% of trustees used three or more resources to inform their decision making.  Seventy-five to 85% of trustees rated online articles and repository services as being useful.   Trustees actively checked the trustworthiness of online resources by evaluating sources, cross-checking data, and asking colleagues.  Key barriers to using online resources included lack of time, finding reliable or relevant information, and negotiating conflicting results.  Some trustees wanted access to a third-party, repository of valid, reliable information.

Au cours des cinq dernières années, le processus de prise de décisions des officiels des conseils scolaires a suscité un grand intérêt. Il existe cependant peu d’études sur la façon dont ces dirigeants utilisent les ressources en ligne pour guider leurs prises de décisions. Grâce à un sondage en ligne et à des entrevues menées en personne, la présente étude se penche sur l’usage que font les commissaires scolaires (n=164) des ressources en ligne pour appuyer les décisions du conseil. Les commissaires se servaient d’articles en ligne (actualités, articles de recherche, revues) deux fois plus que des réseaux sociaux (Twitter, Facebook, blogues) ou de services d’archivage (services de coupures de presse, Google Scholar). Près de 70 % des commissaires se servaient de trois ressources ou plus pour guider leurs décisions. De 75 % à 85 % des commissaires estimaient que les articles en ligne et les services d’archivage étaient utiles. Les commissaires vérifiaient activement la fiabilité des ressources en ligne en évaluant les sources, en recoupant les données et en demandant l’avis de collègues. Les principaux obstacles à l’usage des ressources en ligne comprenaient le manque de temps, la difficulté à trouver des renseignements fiables ou pertinents, et l’évaluation de résultats contradictoires. Certains commissaires souhaitaient accéder à des archives externes rassemblant des renseignements fiables et valides.


Keywords


school boards; trustees; knowledge-based decision making; online resources; technology; leadership; decision-making; social media; knowledge mobilization

Full Text:

PDF

References


Campbell, C., & Fulford, D. (2009, April). From knowledge generation to knowledge integration: Analysis of how a government uses research. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/research/aera2009_kipaper.pdf

Cooper, A., Edelstein, H., Levin, B., & Leung, J. (2010, May). Use of web-based research materials in education: Is uptake occurring? Paper presented at the Canadian Society for the Study of Education (CSSE) Conference, Montreal, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/rspe/UserFiles/File/CSSEWebtrackerFinal.doc

Cooper, A., Levin, B., & Campbell, C. (2009). The growing (but still limited) importance of evidence in education policy and practice. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2-3), 159 -171. doi:10.1007/s10833-00909107-0

Davies, H., Nutley, S. M., & Smith, P.C. (2000). What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol, England: The Policy Press.

Dobbins, M., Rosenbaum, P., Plews, N., Law, M., & Fysh, A. (2007). Information transfer: What do decision makers want and need from researchers? Implementation Science, 2(20). doi:10.1186/1748-5908-2-20

Doyle, D. (2002). Knowledge-based decision making. The School Administrator, 59(11), 30-34. Retrieved from http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/rspe/UserFiles/File/CEA%20Study/InterimReport_ResearchUse_CEAOISE_July09.pdf

Edelstein, H. (2011). Collaborative practices in mobilizing education research knowledge from public organizations across the internet. Télescope, 17(3), 140–157. Retrieved from http://www.telescope.enap.ca/Telescope/docs/English%20papers/volume17/vol-17-3_hilary_edelstein.pdf

Fusarelli, L. (2008). Flying (partially) blind: School leaders' use of research in decision making. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(5), 365-368. Retrieved from http://www.kappanmagazine.org/content/89/5/365.full.pdf+html

Galway, G. (2006). An investigation of the uses of evidence and research in the educational decision making of policy elites (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.unisa.edu.au/

Hemsley-Brown, J. (2005). Using research to support management decision making within the field of education. Management Decision, 43(5), 691-705. doi:10.1108/00251740510597716

Landry, H., Nguyen, K., Kawebe, K., & Shah, V. (2012). Training modules for school governance. Internal research report. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Public School Boards’ Association (OPSBA).

Levin, B. (2008, May). Thinking about knowledge mobilization. Paper presented at the Canadian Council on Learning and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Harrison Hot Springs, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.ccl-cca.ca/pdfs/OtherReports/LevinDiscussionPaperEN.pdf

Levin, B. (2010). Leadership for evidence-informed education, School Leadership & Management: Formerly School Organisation, 30(4), 303-315. doi:10.1080/13632434.2010.497483

Levin, B. (2011a). Mobilising research knowledge in education. London Review of Education, 9(1), 15-26. doi:10.1080/147484660.2011.550431

Levin, B. (2011b). Lessons in mobilizing research knowledge. Paper presented at Canadian Society for the Study of Education Conference, Fredericton, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/rspe/UserFiles/File/CSSE%202011%20RSPE_Levin.pdf

Levin, B. (2012) Global voices overview: Research and practice. Using what we know. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(6), 72-73. Retrieved from http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/rspe/UserFiles/File/Kappan_Mar12_research.pdf

Levin, B., & Cooper, A. (2012). Theory, research and practice in mobilizing research knowledge in education. In T. Fenwick and L. Farrell (Eds.), Knowledge mobilization and educational research (pp. 18-29). New York, NY: Routledge.

Levin, B., Cooper, A., Arjomand, S., & Thompson, K. (2010, May). Increasing research use in Canadian secondary schools. Paper presented at the Canadian Society for the Study of Education Conference, Montreal, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/rspe/UserFiles/File/CSSE-CEA_Interventions_Final.doc

Maynard, A. (2007). Translating evidence into practice: Why is it so difficult? Public Money & Management, 27(4), 251-256. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9302.2007.00591.x

Miles, M. B. & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

Ministry of Education. (2013). Education facts: Schools and school boards. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/educationFacts.html

Mitton, C., Adair, C. E., McKenzie, E., Patten, S. B., & Perry, B. W. (2007). Knowledge transfer and exchange: Review of the literature. The Milbank Quarterly, 85(4), 729-768. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00506.x

Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Davies, H. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol, England: The Policy Press.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007). Evidence in education: Linking research and policy. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/38797034.pdf

Pentland, D., Forsyth, K., Maciver, D., Walsh, M., Murray, R., Irvine, L., & Sikora, S. (2011). Key characteristics of knowledge transfer and exchange in healthcare: integrative literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(7), 1408-1425. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05631.x

Sá, C., Li, S. X., & Faubert, B. (2011). Faculties of education and institutional strategies for knowledge mobilization: an exploratory study. Higher Education, 61(5), 501-512. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9344-4

Sheppard, B., Galway, G., Brown, J., & Wiens, J. (2013). School boards matter. The report of the pan-Canadian study of school district governance. Retrieved from http://cdnsba.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/School-Boards-Matter-Report-Small.pdf

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Tapscott, D. (2008). Grown up digital. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Education, 27(2), 237-246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748

Witherow, K. (2011). Research use and the impact in secondary schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). OISE, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON. Retrieved from https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/29910/6/Witherow_Katherine_201106_EdD_thesis.pdf




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21432/T2NC93

Copyright (c) 2017 Robin Holding Kay, Loralea Carruthers

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.